Fraudulent Venture Investor gets a Legal Fights Back from Fintech Forerunner

San Jos?, Costa Rica ? A continent-spanning saga of theft, betrayal, cryptocurrency, and concealed identity draw to a close in London and San Jos? four years ago. The co-founder of fintech pioneer B?rser S.A., Walter Gomez, has now decided to formally announce his pursuit of legal action against Edward Roworth and Jaspal Singh Arri. The action strives for the retrieval of $1 million demanded by Gomez and his partners following a transaction that started in 2015 and was incomplete.
The original settlement, that involved the trade of Venezuelan bolivares and US dollars, at a preferred rate described, was signed by Gomez and Arri in a binding contract. Arri represented himself as the head of a corporate party. Gomez and his associates in the operation?Cesar Potenza, Natividad Rojas, Sofia Akly, and Jerome Kislingbury?provided the bolivares, and Arri settled to exchange for $1M US.
The deal?s logic was clear enough. Gomez is the founder of B?rser S.A., that consist of three distinct companies: Mi Wall Street, which offers world-class financial services to independent investors; CrowdingFunds, a blockchain-based crowdfunding platform; and X-Change, a low-cost service that simplifies the exchange between B?rser?s cryptocurrency and fiat currency. B?rser is also one of the world?s most inventive fintech organizations.
The company?s demonstrated knowledge in complex exchange instruments made it an attractive partner. So, Arri issued a first payment of $35k in late 2015 after some delays. This sum was issued from a bank based in Dubai and drawn from sources in India.
Gomez constantly tried to reach Arri, with some concern over the suddenly complicated nature of what should have been a straightforward exchange of funds, but never got an answer.
He would not hear from him again.
Later, in 2016, Richard Durrant contacted Gomez and offered a trade of currencies akin to the one Arri had failed to honor. After frequent discussions and a face-to-face meeting in the border town of Cucuta, Colombia, with Durrant?s representative Edward Patrick Roworth, Gomez decided to continue the transaction, but Roworth failed to follow through to keep his word. Roworth presented himself in 2017 as a potential angel investor in Gomez?s new fintech venture, B?rser. Roworth sent a small amount of seed capital in exchange for some of B?rser?s tokens but never provided either the funding or the personnel he assured.
Still, he continued claiming that he was owed the previously agreed-upon (but never paid for) shares of the company. Later, charging in B?rser shares for this action, he organized a small venture by an Australian father and son.
For the next 18 months, he made similar one-sided and ultimately unconsummated arrangements.
In late 2018, it came to light that both, Jaspal Singh Arri and Richard Durrant, were business partners of Roworth and connected to his organization called Eco Worldwide Ltd. As it was later exposed, Eco Worldwide turned out to be a company-on-paper only, created by Roworth, with zero cash flow, employees and no target market whatsoever, an empty business.
Durrant was seemingly sent by Roworth to ply Gomez after Arri had exhausted his strategies.
Roworth failed to deliver, once again, after promising to make amends for the 2015 theft committed under his company?s guise. By then, B?rser S.A. had become a successful player in the cryptocurrency market, and it was precisely during this time that Roworth claimed by now that he was owed a controlling stake of the company and redoubled his claims for shares; when Gomez reminded Roworth of the notarized and signed contract they both agreed to?a contract which in no way admits the possibility of Roworth being issued a controlling share of B?rser?Roworth began a smear campaign against Gomez, hitting a new low.
This attack was as thorough and carefully orchestrated as Roworth?s earlier efforts to defraud Gomez.
Roworth thoroughly contacted Gomez?s business associates, casting unwarranted and unsubstantiated calumnies on his character and on B?rser?s feasibility as a company, even after completely libeling Gomez online.
Roworth enlisted help as well: the Australian father and son whose purchase of B?rser tokens Roworth had organized arranged as a supposed gesture of investment in the company participated actively in the campaign to stain Gomez?s hard-earned reputation. Roworth contacted Gomez directly, in the middle of his smear crusade, threatening to falsify documents, going from transcripts of conversations up to phone messages, if Gomez did not relinquish his controlling interest in B?rser.
Roworth abandoned all pretense of negotiating a business deal and resorted to overt blackmail when Gomez refused. His tactics at this stage became even more desperate, blunt, and dangerous; hitting his nadir when attempting to extract $50,000 USD from Gomez on threat of sending a visit to his home from a ?South American collector?.
Gomez is now pursuing legal action initiated in his home country, to be followed by an international action in London, after documenting the entire campaign against him. These pending legal actions seek full compensation for the $1 million agreed upon by Arri, acting as Roworth?s agent, and for damages commensurate with the libel directed against him. To learn the real story behind the slander, please contact B?rser S.A.?s legal department.

Company :-Roworth

Email :-olivertaylor943@gmail.com